(Source: bdsmsadomasochism)
18 notes
Hello everyone let me introduce myself: I am Queen Titania, a gender fluid dominatrix. I am coming to you today to talk about one of my favorite activities. Sensory deprivation is the most unadulterated fun I can have in a session, and I hope I can give everyone a few ideas on how to have fun with it and then help put a dehumanization twist on it! Sensory deprivation presents an extremely unique opportunity: the chance to instill fear in a bottom, slave or submissive without putting them in any actual danger. Successful sensory deprivation play is defined by theatrics and mental manipulation rather than physical pain or predicaments. In this one sided psychological warfare there is also an added element that few take advantage of, the ability to indulge in intense dehumanization scenes. Let us first introduce the basics of sensory deprivation before we indulge in those possibilities. Terminology also becomes important as words like “it” and “thing” convey a sense of genderless objectification that can be very powerful, especially with the mindset this play creates. It can be taken in a different direction with the use of animal names; doggy, kitty, Fido, pig, ostrich, panda, etc. Knowing your partner is important here. If they have a major fetish for objectification, robot play, drone play or feeling like a “thing” you may want to go towards animal names, and vice versa. Why? Well, if turn them on and make them feel more like themselves that is hardly dehumanizing! However, worrying about such a minor detail is a bit silly unless you are completely serious about delivering the most dehumanizing mind fuck possible. Concern yourself more with choice insults and humiliating taunts to follow up your choice of terminology and remind the subject they are below you. Of course, you could also use silence. Whether or not you have chosen to take away the submissive’s hearing silence is powerful. A person is used to being talked to. They get uncomfortable when they feel they are being ignored.
Now you have someone helpless and disoriented before you… what to do now? Re-orient them! There are two ways that seem most popular: physical sensation play and through psychological intimidation and confusion. The first temptation is usually sensation play. It is great fun to tease and confuse your partner with toys they have never experienced before or may be unable to recognize by touch alone. Objects such as vampire gloves, massage gloves and vibrators, knives, ice cubes and a variety of interesting textures can be used to tease without even making genital contact. That is not saying you should not make genital contact, however it is best built up to! A gradual progression of interesting sensations with brief strokes closer and closer to the erogenous zones builds up to a very intense reaction when you finally begin applying direct stimulation.
It is in the mystery of the unseen scratchers or horrific buzzing sound of vibrating toys that creates the specific opportunity for intense mind fucks, gender play or at the furthest extreme: dehumanization. In sensory deprivation play the perception of events is as important as the event itself. The sensations are heightened due to fear, whether it is a scratch or a noise. In this case, you are designing a scene to strip a person of their humanity.
There are many ways to achieve this, but let us discuss a “basic” scenario I have used in the past. The first step is obvious, a rather extreme form of sensory deprivation. A proper hood and mitts are your friends here. A hood with no eye holes and a zipper closure on the mouth is vital for making a person feel helpless, and the mitts make it so they well… cannot feel! From here you will want to take their gender out of the equation. There are two ways to do this, you might place a chastity belt on them… or you might simply ignore it. I find option two to work better. Option one constantly reminds them they still have a penis or a vagina because it is covered in plastic or cold metal. They might feel pain from it. Instead, we want them to feel nothing at all and to feel like we are completely unaware it exists.
There is however a slight modification that can be quite fun. Instead of immobilization, try restricting mobility. Isn’t it more fun to see them struggle or writhe in agony during a beating? So feel free to play with it! Instead of immobilizing them, make it possible for them to move a little bit. A recent session I did provided a wonderful example of why this works. The sub was covered in latex clothing for the first time, changing the way his skin felt. He had latex gloves on, and a hood that covered his eyes. From there he was placed face down on the ground, and his hands and legs were bound behind him using duct tape. He was then told to struggle and wriggle like a worm to move around. The result was quite the spectacle, a man who could barely move an inch at a time, who could not roll over and could not escape the predicament. After half an hour of blindly struggling I was left with a mentally and physically exhausted “thing.”
By giving a person a chance to fail at simple tasks you break them down. It is physically and mentally exhausting to fight back against bondage in this predicament. After taking away their senses, their name, their gender and their mobility you will be left with a broken mess on the ground ready for your manipulation. This has not been an exhaustive resource, but I think it will give you some new ideas to play with.
- By the Lovely Titania
Before we go any further let’s define forced feminization. Forced feminization is a type of play in which the dominant “forces” the submissive to act/dress/appear in a traditionally “feminine” manner. This can include wearing “female” clothing, the application of makeup, the use of a “feminine” name, the removal/concealment of things associated with masculinity (“forced” depilation) and training on “feminine” subjects, for example a dominant might force a submissive to learn to walk in high heels. This form of play can involve dominants and submissives of any combination of genders, sexes, and usual level of butch and/or femme-ness, with the goal of having the submissive be more “femme” by the end of the scene than at the start of the scene.
Sometimes it can also include play involving the sex of the submissive. This is usually but not always “forcing” a non-female identified submissive to imitate body characteristics traditionally associated with femaleness, such as tucking back the penis should the submissive have one, or the use of breast forms on the submissive.
Forced feminization is a complicated kink, and a mine-field of anti-femme bullshit, transphobic bullshit, misogynistic bullshit, and homophobic bullshit… but despite some of the more unfortunate implications it can have it’s a popular fantasy and can actually be really progressive and obviously can be a fun way to blend gender play with BDSM. It’s important to remember that gender play isn’t just for straight and/or cis people. In some ways being comfortable enough with our gender to break out of our gender role, to play with it sexually, to present and perform in unexpected ways can be (for people who enjoy it and are comfortable with it) a really freeing experience. If a trans woman gets off on strapping it on it doesn’t make her less of a woman, if a trans man gets off on wearing panties it doesn’t make him less of a man, if a non-binary person gets off on wearing attire very associated with a binary gender it doesn’t make them less non-binary. Of course for a lot of people this is a delicate area of play, being misgendered and dealing with people’s shitty attitudes can make the use of gender in play tricky at best, and turn forced feminization into a nightmare rather than a fantasy. For other people playing with gender can be a way to reclaim parts of the self, work through aspects of one’s gender, and/or deal with painful experiences surrounding gender.
So, now let’s talk about how all this can interact with social structures, misogyny and the rest.
On the one hand you can think of forced feminization as based around the idea that femininity is inferior, or somehow inherently degrading. Well, personally I say enough of that second wave noise. Despite the fact that one can interpret forced feminization as a way of reenforcing the “masculinity = dominance/activity” and “femininity = submission/passivity” paradigm or interpret it as a statement about how either femininity is humiliating, or being a non-woman in “women’s” clothing is humiliating, I would say those are over simplifications. Which is not to say there aren’t people who use this as a shitty passive aggressive way to enforce exactly those things, but those aren’t the only ways to interpret it.
In a more progressive and positive light one could say forced feminization play for some people, can be a form of forced bravery play, or forced honesty play, with a submissive who due to internalized misogyny and anti-femme messages from the larger culture has suppressed whatever femme qualities they happen to have.
Being “forced” to wear the heels you secretly want to wear anyway can be a really great way for a submissive to learn to accept that they want to wear heels.
I’m genderqueer/genderfluid, I don’t always feel female, but I’m always very femme. I’m also actively involved in feminism and have been interested in it since I was a child. Being female assigned at birth I’ve dealt with shame and discomfort surrounding my femme-ness, both in terms of my gender identity and in terms of my politics.
I grew up in the nineties, a time when “girl power” reigned supreme, and I was told I was weak and too “girly” because I preferred playing barbies to playing soccer and because I preferred skirts and (later) heels to jeans and sneakers, and it took me a really long time to realize that belief in equality and the rights of women were not inherently opposed to my liking lipstick. I remember actually having an argument about cosmetics with a writing teacher of mine, and similar arguments about fashion and so on with other teachers. No one ever told me my femininity didn’t automatically disqualify me from viewing myself as a feminist (with the exception of my parents).
Later as I hit puberty I realized I wasn’t straight, which was another problem for me navigating my natural tendency to be feminine in society. I was sick of being invisible as a dyke, and sick of being seen as hopping on the homosexuality bandwagon (back then I identified as bisexual, and then pansexual… though technically neither made sense as a label for me) and so I desperately tried to butch it up, I cut off my hair (something I honestly really didn’t want to do) and dressed differently. Shortly thereafter I began to realize that I wasn’t entirely female, but that I still didn’t feel butch. I longed to be androgynous in makeup. I went through intense periods of dysphoria, and yet no one would listen to me about my gender identity because it wasn’t wholly male, and because I wore about five pounds of makeup all the time.
It took me a lot of time to deal with the idea that my femininity, my flamboyance, and my love of makeup invalidated my gender, my sexuality, and my politics, and to allow myself to be who I really am deep down.
Not only all this, but being femme, especially as flamboyantly femme as I personally am wont to be, attracts attention. It makes one a target for sexual comments (especially from men) more than “butch” attire, it leads to being stereotyped in certain ways more than more neutral attire, and on people who are read as male it often draws derision and insult.
Basically, because of a stew of societal hang ups, it takes courage to put on that lipstick and slide into that dress because of what people might think of us. Having someone force us into the dress and lipstick can be pleasurable because it takes the responsibility off us for a moment, as well giving us (in a strange way) the sense that what we’re doing is ok.
Forced feminization can be an outlet for that repressed femme part of our personality, or a way of helping a sub develop the courage to be their whole self, a reminder that femininity doesn’t invalidate any other part of their identity, or even a way of “humiliating” a sub for their lack of self acceptance, and enforcing the importance of having the courage to be themselves.
The part that’s a little harder to navigate in a positive way is when body parts get involved (E.G. where boobs are suddenly a part of feminization, or not having a cock is a requirement) or when it involves actually misgendering someone (E.G. intentionally using the wrong pronouns for erotic effect). In terms of the first element it can be a way of again doing something the submissive wants to do (have boobs, or not have a cock, etc) but doesn’t have the courage to do themselves without someone pushing. In terms of actual misgendering, I think that can be chalked up to eroticized fear. Sometimes it can be oddly comforting to hear what one fears hearing most in a safe and controlled environment, being misgendered is something very unpleasant to experience so hearing it in a safe environment can in an odd way lessen the impact (for some people) when/if it actually happens and lessen the sense of dread it causes.
Of course there’s also the option of “forcing” someone to be the gender thet feel themselves to actually be, which again brings up the “force” as way to supplement courage, and way to reduce fear of social stigma.
Obviously no one should be actually shamed for being closeted or having discomfort surrounding their identity, but being pushed towards self acceptance in a D/s context can be very valuable.
In essence forced feminization can mean a lot of things, it really depends on how one looks at it.
Now, this isn’t a poly focused blog, it’s poly friendly, but it’s not generally a blog about poly. I’m not poly (my partner and I are sexually open, but we don’t have other relationships) and so don’t feel qualified to write about it generally, however having had a reasonable amount of experience with menage au trois (or more) I decided to come up with a list of roleplay dynamics for three people (largely these will be gender neutral)
Saline drip breast expansion. It’s a hard thing to learn to do, but it looks tons of fun. It can be used for gender play, dollification play, general pain play, or just the fun of filling someone’s chest area with water.
Win. I think I’ll get my friend who’s an RN to teach me about this one.
The last post here got a big response, a lot of people were upset over me “telling them how to have sex” and someone pointed out “there’s also no safe way to go sky diving” and someone else said “they’re really sick of female dominants being demonized” (I’m not really sure what the last one had to do with anything considering in no way did I mention female dominants, and being the sub of a female dominant… well I’d be the last to demonize female dominants) but anyway, the point is, that I’m not trying to demonize, control, or shunt others into a corner.
I talk to you folks (you being the readers of this blog) like friends, hell I regard you as friends because… well you’re my fellow kinky queers and I love you folks, and although I fully understand it’s your right as adults to do whatever you like with other consenting adults, I would be sad if any of you died (actually I’m basically sad when anyone dies) and so yes, I will tell you that it is my recommendation that no one’s air supply be cut off because it’s riskier than I’m comfortable with. I’m also going to recommend generally against sky diving, drag racing, bungee jumping, alligator wrestling, mushroom hunting, drinking milk you can’t find an expiration date on, and eating at McDonalds. Ultimately, these things are up to you, and it’s your decision whether you want to do them, and if you choose to do them I’m not going to judge you or love you any less, but you folks are my buddies, my pals, my super awesome secret society of awesome, and so, perhaps selfishly I don’t want any of you bungee jumping because I’d be vastly upset were something to happen to any of you.
Now, in the end as long as its between consenting adults aware of the risks involved I believe it’s perfectly moral and acceptable, but I’d be a shitty friend if I didn’t have a slight bias towards “be on the safe side because I love you guys” so, yes, practice RACK (risk aware consensual kink) and rock on with yo’ bad selves… and take good care of yourselves because I’ll be sad if you don’t.
So, strangulation, suffocation, all of this stuff is breath control play. All of this stuff is INCREDIBLY dangerous, and not just for the reasons you think. Most of the deaths caused by erotic breath control situations are not caused by strangulation/suffocation itself, but of a massive heart attack about 15 to 20 minutes later, sometimes this can be the result of less than a minute of suffocation. As well, over time lack of oxygen causes brain damage, and generally one wants to avoid that. For these reasons, you actually shouldn’t actually cut off oxygen to the submissive.
I repeat: DO NOT ACTUALLY STOP ANYONE FROM BREATHING. DO NOT RESTRICT ANYONE’S ABILITY TO BREATHE.
For safe “strangulation” play put your hand above the hyoid bone (the adam’s apple), just under the jaw and press lightly upwards, the subject should be unable to vocalize as normal (though will usually still be able to talk, just not as loudly), but will still be able to breathe. Make sure to communicate thoroughly during this sort of play with your partner, and make sure that they are still able to breath at all times. This is a nice way to give the feeling of vulnerability associated with strangling, and enjoy the power dynamic involved without having to do anything dangerous. Do not EVER put pressure on the hyoid bone as it’s delicate and breaking it results in death. As well the pressure should be light, the windpipe is delicate, and easily crushed, and crushing it results in death, and you don’t want that. Also do be careful not to put pressure on the carotid artery (which runs down the side of the neck) as putting pressure on the carotid can cut off oxygen to the brain, which can cause unconsciousness, cardiac arrest and death, so yeah watch out for that.
Similarly, putting a submissive in a position where the dominant is in control of their oxygen intake, but does not actually remove their access to it can be a way to play with this as well, but requires great care. For example, a rubber mask with a tube for oxygen access can be worn by the submissive, putting the dominant in a position where, were they to squeeze the hose shut, the submissive would be left unable to breath, but of course the dominant does not do so. This also requires clear communication during play, make sure a safety gesture is established, and watch for it closely.
Do not EVER put a cord around someone’s throat, it’s too hard to control, and too hard to gauge pressure applied.
There is simply no safe way to actually cut off oxygen to a human being, so don’t do it. Really, the appeal of breath play is not actually the cutting off of oxygen, but the feeling of vulnerability, and that can be achieved without actually taking away the ability to breath.
I know some of you out there are going to insist on cutting off someone’s oxygen anyway, and normally I’d give you tips on how to do it as safely as possible if you absolutely must do it… but there’s no way to do this safely, or even any more safely. So, generally, I beg of you, don’t do this. It’s not safe.
An excellent article by an EMT on the subject
Another Nice Article On The Subject
Play safe out there.
Violet Wands for skin care are a lot cheaper than ones intended for BDSM, just look up “High Frequency skin care” and you’ll find a bunch around $100-$200 instead of the $300-800 one would pay for one intended for kink. It’s the same damn thing. Although not as pretty as the kink based sets, this is quite a savings.
Now, electricity is dangerous, it can cause burns, death, and lots of other nasty things, but when used properly with the right tools electricity can be sizzling hot. Now there are plenty of different toys for electrical play, and I’m going to tell you all about them.
The Toys:
General Safety Tips: